Showing posts with label brain damage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brain damage. Show all posts

Monday, November 17, 2008

Nanoparticles damage brain cells.

Nov 17, 2008

Wang J, Y Liu, F Jiao, F Lao, W Li, Y Gu, Y Li, C Ge, G Zhou, B Li , Y Zhao, Z Chai and C Chen. 2008. Time-dependent translocation and potential impairment of central nervous system by intranasally instilled TiO2 nanoparticles. Toxicology doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.014.




2008-1030titaniumbioxidenano-small
Scientists have shown for the first time that very small particles of titanium dioxide (TiO2) can travel from the nose to the brain and cause damage to brain cells in laboratory mice. TiO2 is a white pigment widely used in paints, coatings, plastics, cosmetics, sunscreens and other personal care products. These results suggest that short-term exposure to nano-sized TiO2 via breathing could lead to brain injuries.

Context

Nanomaterials are very small particles that are about 1 to 100 nanometers in size. For perspective, a human hair is about 80 micrometers in width. Nano-sized particles are about 1,000 times smaller, or about 1 to 100 nanometers. At this small size, these materials can interact with atomic or molecular structures.

Naturally-occurring nanomaterials include sea salt, soil dust and volcanic dust. Others are synthetic, produced as an industrial byproduct (soot from burning fossil fuels and industrial dusts) or engineered with specific, desired properties useful in manufacturing and other applications (carbon black, metal oxides, quantum dots).

Very small nano-sized particles may have different physical and chemical properties than in their larger bulk forms. These differences are being exploited by chemical and physical engineers. Nanomaterials are anticipated to yield numerous advances in many fields, espcecially medicine and health care through targeted drug delivery, new cancer therapies and early disease detection. However, their special properties may also have undesirable effects.

Metal oxide nanomaterials are widely used in industry for their valuable mangnetic, electric and optical properties. TiO2 is a highly used white pigment added to paints, coatings, plastics, inks, foods, medicines, toothpaste, cosmetics, sunscreens and other personal care products. Workers may be exposed to nano-sized TiO2 particles (termed “ultrafine” by industry) during processing or applying TiO2 to manufactured goods. Consumers are exposed when using the products.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified TiO2 as a possible human carcinogen based upon evidence from laboratory studies in animals (IARC 2006). Breathing the nano-sized TiO2 particles significantly increased risk of lung cancer. There is also evidence from laboratory animal studies that inhaled TiO2 can deposit on lungs and cause inflammation (Oberdörster 2000; Orsier and Oberdörster 1997).

Because of their small size and chemical properties, nanoparticles can traverse the protective membrane barrier surrounding cells. It is important to note that some cells, especially nerve cells, extend long distances in the body. For example, the olfactory nerve extends from the nose into an area of the brain that deciphers smell, called the olfactory bulb. Particles inside cells, then, could reach other parts of the body and the brain, such as the hippocampus and cortex.

What did they do?

Laboratory mice breathed in nano-sized TiO2 particles to determine if the material could reach the brain, how long the journey would take and if it would damage brain tissue.

The mice inhaled a preparation of 500 micrograms of TiO2 particles suspended in water every other day for 30 days. This dosing method is analogous to taking a nasal spray medicine. The researchers at the nanomaterials laboratory in Beijing, China, tested two different sizes of TiO2: nano-sized (80 nanometers) and slightly larger particles (155 nanometers).

Mice brains were examined on days 2, 10, 20 and 30 to determine how quickly the particles might travel to the brain. The content of TiO2 in specific regions of the brain was determined using mass spectrometry, an instrument that used molecular weight to measure amounts. Also, the scientists looked at the brains cells in the exposed animals using transmission electron microscopy.

Finally, to determine if TiO2 exposure caused chemical changes in the brain, the authors measured levels of certain molecules called cytokines that indicate increased inflammation and cell stress.


What did they find?

After two days and only one inhalation exposure, significant amounts of both sizes of TiO2 were found in the brain, especially in the olfactory bulb. The amount of TiO2 in brain tissues increased with continued exposure, and the maximum levels were observed after 30 days (15 individual inhalations).

After 10 days of exposure, TiO2 was also detected in other areas of the brain, including the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and hippocampus. The greatest accumulation of nano-sized TiO2 occurred in the hippocampus at 30 days where the concentration reached about 280 nanograms of TiO2 per gram of brain tissue.

Researchers observed significant changes in the cells of the olfactory bulb and hipoccampus regions of the brain in the TiO2-exposed mice (but not the cerebral cortex or cerebellum). In the olfactory bulb, there were more neuron cells than normal, while cells in the hippocampus appeared to be damaged and degenerating.

Finally, levels of certain biomarker molecules indicative of inflammation and cell stress were higher in the brains of TiO2-exposed mice.


The findings of this study are significant for three key reasons. First, it showed conclusively that inhaled TiO2 can travel from the nose to the brain. Normally, the brain is protected from toxins by the blood-brain barrier. But in the case of breathing exposures, the nanoparticles may evade this protection by traveling along the olfactory nerve from the nose to the brain. This “backdoor” pathway circumvents the brain’s natural shield that blocks unwanted chemicals from reaching sensitive brain cells.

Second, this study provides evidence that inhaling TiO2 particles can damage brain cells. According to the authors, “these results imply that the function of neurons in the hippocampus would be greatly injured” from the TiO2 exposure. The hippocampus is the critical center of the brain responsible for short-term memory and spatial navigation. However, further studies are necessary to test whether breathing the nano-sized TiO2 particles impacts brain function.

Third, TiO2's effects were observed at a relatively low exposure dose and within a short period of time. The nano-sized TiO2 particles showed up in the brain within two days following one dose of 500 micrograms, which is about the size of a grain of salt. The quick transfer into the brain raises serious safety concerns for workers who may be exposed to ultrafine TiO2 during its manufacture or application to numerous industrial and commercial products.

TiO2 nanomaterials are in some cosmetics and personal care products, although it is not known what human inhalation exposure may result from the application and use of these items (such as facial powders that may be dusty).

Source

Monday, March 31, 2008

Mobile Phone-Brain Tumour Public Health Advisory

Vini G. Khurana, MBBS, BSc(Med), PhD, FRACS

[SNIPS]

At this time, precautionary but strong recommendations for members of the General Public include (whenever feasible or possible): (i) using a regular "land-line" in preference to a hand-held mobile or cordless phone; (ii) using a hand-held phone on "speaker phone" mode held > 20 cm away or "in-vehicle hands-free speaker" mode as opposed to the typical "mobile phone-to-ear" use; (iii) minimising the use of current Bluetooth devices and unshielded headphone accessories for mobile phones; (iv) minimising the amount of time spent using mobile and cordless phones for all adults; and (v) restricting the use of mobile and cordless phones by children to emergency situations. For members of the Telecommunications Industry, the author recommends expediting the development and promotion of safe, practical and ubiquitous EMR/radiofrequency shielding devices for mobile and cordless phones and their Bluetooth and headset accessories, and further refinement of the hands-free "speaker phone" option.

Key messages of this work:

  • Mobile phones are convenient and frequently invaluable, yet exposure to their electromagnetic radiation is invisible. Therefore, any danger this exposure poses may be easily dismissed.
  • Exposure is long-term and its effects on the body, particularly its electrical organ, the brain, are compounded by numerous other simultaneous long-term exposures including continuous waves from radio and TV transmitter towers, cordless phone base stations, power lines, and wireless/WiFi computing devices.
  • A malignant brain tumour represents a life-ending diagnosis in the vast majority of those diagnosed. There is a significant and increasing body of evidence, to date at least 8 comprehensive clinical studies internationally and one long-term meta-analysis, for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumours.
  • Taken together, the data presented below compellingly suggest that the link between mobile phones and brain tumours should no longer be regarded as a myth. Individual and class action lawsuits have been filed in the USA, and at least one has already been successfully prosecuted, regarding the cell phone-brain tumour link.
  • The "incubation time" or "latency" (i.e., the time from commencement of regular mobile phone usage to the diagnosis of a malignant solid brain tumour in a susceptible individual) may be in the order of 10-20 years. In the years 2008-2012, we will have reached the appropriate length of follow-up time to begin to definitively observe the impact of this global technology on brain tumour incidence rates.
  • There is currently enough evidence and technology available to warrant Industry and Governments alike in taking immediate steps to reduce exposure of consumers to mobile phone-related electromagnetic radiation and to make consumers clearly aware of potential dangers and how to use this technology sensibly and safely.
  • It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking, and directly concerns all of us, particularly the younger generation, including very young children.
  • Scientists and physicians from some academic centres worldwide came together in mid-2007 to propose safer standards regarding public exposure to electromagnetic fields (Click the link for details).
Link

Monday, March 10, 2008

Diesel exhaust fumes ugly and dangerous

11 March 2008 -- If the smell of diesel exhaust isn't enough to make you avoid getting a lungful, new research now shows that even a short exposure to the fumes can affect your brain. A study published in the open access journal Particle and Fibre Toxicology reveals that an hour of sniffing exhaust induces a stress response in the brain's activity.

Previous studies have already suggested that very small particles, called nanoparticles, breathed in from polluted air can end up in the brain. But this is the first time that scientists have demonstrated that inhalation actually alters brain activity.

Ten volunteers spent one hour in a room filled with either clean air or exhaust from a diesel engine. They were wired up to an electroencephalograph (EEG), a machine that records the electrical signals of the brain, and their brain waves were monitored during the exposure period and for one hour after they left the room.

The researchers found that after about 30 minutes the diesel exhaust began to affect brain activity. The EEG data suggested that the brain displayed a stress response, indicative of changed information processing in the brain cortex, which continued to increase even after the subjects had left the exposure chamber.


The concentration of diesel exhaust that the subjects breathed was set to the highest level that people might encounter in the environment or at work, for example on a busy road or in a garage.


Lead researcher Paul Borm from Zuyd University in The Netherlands said: "We believe our findings are due to an effect nanoparticles or 'soot' particles that are major component of diesel exhaust. These may penetrate to the brain and affect brain function. We can only speculate what these effects may mean for the chronic exposure to air pollution encountered in busy cities where the levels of such soot particles can be very high."


One link to understanding the mechanism of this effect is that oxidative stress is one consequence of particles depositing in tissue and oxidative stress has also been implicated in degenerative brain diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease.


"It is conceivable that the long-term effects of exposure to traffic nanoparticles may interfere with normal brain function and information processing," noted Borm. "Further studies are necessary to explore this effect, and to assess the relationship between the amount of exposure to particles and the brain's response and, and investigate the clinical implications of these novel findings."


Studies that expose volunteers to potential toxins or require invasive techniques are limited for ethical reasons. Borm is currently conducting experiments where volunteers inhale artificially generated nanoparticles that are free from the other chemicals that are generated, along with the nanoparticles in diesel exhaust.

http://www.farmnews.co.nz/news/2008/mar/855.shtml

Can the ANI TiO2 nano air cleaner in a car/truck/vehicle interior at least cleanse the air in the car breathed during a road trip involving diesel engined vehicles in the vicinity? Has boss Bijou been in touch with GM, Ford, Mercedes et al?? Has anybody??

More to the point - install (legislate the requirement if necessary) a cleaner/converter/whatever on every diesel engine so they do not spill their death fumes into the air we breath.

Should the unit installed contain NPI IP - great. Would our TiO2 nanocleaner be capable of cleaning the exhaust from a diesel without fouling? We'll have to do a test to find out! Bijou-Zvi - what say you?

Ref on TiO2 patent filing:
The TiO.sub.2 works by creating free radicals and charged particles that will react with bio and viral contaminants and noxious chemicals near the activated TiO.sub.2, thus decomposing these contaminants into harmless compounds.
US patent link